Colorado Department of Natural Resources Home | Shop | Maps | Jobs | Volunteer | FAQ | Contact |
They're Back! (Spring, 1992)  Printer friendly version Printer friendly version
Who Needs The Razorback Sucker?

by Mary Taylor Young (Gray) and Janet Duvall

They're Back!

Who Needs The Razorback Sucker?
Colorado Success Stories 
Keep Your Eyes Peeled
Bringing Back The Predators
DOW Working For Wildlife: Amphibians

The last word in ignorance is the man who says of an animal or plant: What good is it? If the land mechanism as a whole is good, then every part is good, whether we understand it or not. If the biota, in the course of aeons, has built something we like but do not understand, then who but a fool would discard seemingly useless parts? To keep every cog and wheel is the first precaution of intelligent tinkering.

—Aldo Leopold, Round River, 1953

Perhaps it's part of human nature to tinker. . .to constantly make "repairs" and "adjustments" with no real understanding of the long-term consequences. But in spite of Leopold's logic back in 1953, irreplaceable parts of the keenly balanced biological system—of which we are a part—are disappearing with increasing regularity in the 1990s.

Cover of the spring, 1992 issue of Colorado's Wildlife Company.The arguments for species preservation are familiar to most people: diversity, ecosystem balance, interrelated food webs, aesthetics, ethical considerations, and as-yet-undiscovered agricultural, medical and scientific benefits. Thus far, these logical arguments have convinced only part of the human population. While most people support the concept of species preservation, many back away when they think they must choose between human progress and species survival. These people believe that human survival is more important than (and independent of) the survival of animals, plants and ecosystem balance.

Although the process of extinction is a natural evolutionary phenomenon, human tinkering is pushing many species to extinction at an accelerated rate. In order to preserve threatened and endangered species in the 1990s, those who care must overcome powerful arguments and forge new understandings in the areas of biology, economics, sociology, and ethics. In fact, a completely new kind of consciousness may be required before people will equate species preservation with their own survival.

Today's work will determine how the human species will handle new kinds of threats—just around the corner—to species preservation and ecosystem balance.

Re-creating The Extinct Sucker


The newest threat to species preservation may be arriving in the form of genetic engineering and computer-simulated artificial reality or "virtual reality."

Razorback sucker.Genetic engineers, for example, are heading toward the re-creation of living animals from preserved cellular material. Some might argue, "Why bother preserving or recovering any species, when we can make ourselves a razorback sucker whenever we want one?"
At the same time, virtual reality appears to offer a convenient way to re-create total environments—complete with sights, sounds, and moving parts. Some proponents of virtual reality believe that razorback suckers and the entire river environment can soon be re-created at will through computer simulation. And since humans will be able to create their own reality, some may wonder why we should worry about preserving either species or ecosystems.

The ethical and ecological considerations related to these new technologies demand that humans organize their priorities in relation to species preservation today!

Creating A New Consciousness


Today and for most of written history, human civilization has been based on a model of domination that puts all humans above animals. That kind of hierarchical thinking sets up a philosophical mindset that transcends the human family, permeates society, and determines the way humans think about biological systems. As long as most humans consider themselves superior to and dominant over all other living organisms, it will be difficult for them to seriously consider preserving animal species.

The new consciousness, crucial to improving the human relationship with our natural environment, must eliminate the concept of domination and replace it with partnership or mutually supportive thinking. Looking at ecosystem and species survival from a partnership perspective, it's obvious that all parts are equally necessary for the survival of the whole.

Only partnership thinking will enable all humans to know that re-creating an extinct razorback sucker will not serve the function of a bottom-feeding fish population in maintaining a healthy river ecosystem. Only a new consciousness will let people see that a simulated version of the rain forest will not create oxygen for a world of breathing organisms.

Changing consciousness. That's why we must work to safeguard the razorback sucker and all other species living on Earth today.

Colorado Threatened and Endangered Species


Note: The Colorado threatened and endangered species list has changed since this issue was published in 1992. The original text is reproduced here, as published. The current list of threatened and endangered species is available at the Species of Concern section.

Endangered species are native wildlife whose prospects for survival within the state are in jeopardy.

Colorado Endangered Species

  • Gray wolf
  • Grizzly bear
  • Black-footed ferret
  • River otter
  • Wolverine
  • Lynx
  • American peregrine falcon
  • Least tern
  • Bald eagle
  • Whooping crane
  • Greater sandhill crane
  • Greater prairie-chicken
  • Plains sharp-tailed grouse
  • Colorado squawfish
  • Humpback chub
  • Bonytail
  • Razorback sucker

Threatened species are not in immediate jeopardy of extinction but exist in such small numbers in Colorado, or are so extremely restricted throughout their range, that they may become endangered.

Colorado Threatened Species

  • Lesser prairie-chicken
  • Arctic peregrine falcon
  • Wood frog
  • Greenback cutthroat trout
  • Arkansas darter
  • Piping plover

Extirpated species no longer exist in the wild on historical habitat, but exist elsewhere. Evidence indicates grizzly bears, gray wolves, and black-footed ferrets are, in effect, extirpated from Colorado.

Extinct species no longer exist on earth. Two Colorado species which became extinct within historical times are the Carolina parakeet and the yellowfin cutthroat trout.

A Brief Look At Four From The List


Razorback Sucker—Like other native Colorado River fish, the razorback sucker declined as a result of damming and water diversions that lowered water temperatures, blocked migration to spawning grounds and flooded or dried out habitat. Razorback suckers inhabit the muddy backwaters and tributaries of the Colorado River. Wonderfully adapted to life in the murky depths, suckers use their lips to pluck worms and invertebrates from the bottom, helping recycle nutrients from sediments. Once widespread in the Colorado River system, razor-back suckers are now found only in small numbers in the Yampa, Colorado and Gunnison rivers.

wolverineWolverine—The scientific name for this large member of the weasel family, Gulo gulo, translates as "gluttonous glutton." Wolverines have a broad diet including live prey and berries, but they seem to prefer carrion. It's likely that wolverines were never common in Colorado, because we are on the southern edge of wolverine range. However, many of those in the state were killed when they ate poisoned baits and carcasses set out for coyotes. Wolverines are known for their ferocious temperament. They will drive other predators, even bears and mountain lions, from a kill. Wolverines inhabit dense mountain forests. Colorado has the habitat, but it's uncertain whether any still live in our state.

Least Tern—This smallest of North American terns has long, tapering wings and a forked tail. Channelization and irrigation practices in Colorado destroyed the river sandbars and sandy shore areas originally inhabited by these graceful birds. And because terns nest on sandy beaches, recreational use of their nesting grounds further disrupted their breeding success. Although terns nests are frequently flooded out by fluctuating water levels on irrigation reservoirs, that is where least terns are found in Colorado today.

Piping Plover—Populations of these little shore-birds with the piping call, cousins of the killdeer, have declined in Colorado because of habitat alteration and destruction of nesting sites. Similar to the least tern, piping plover habitat has been altered with channelization and modification of seasonal river flow. Diversion of peak flow (which would have scoured river sand bars and made sandy nesting areas available to the plovers) allows encroachment of vegetation and destruction of nesting sites. Plovers now nest on the sandy beaches of irrigation reservoirs that are exposed when water levels are low. Unfortunately, in high water years the birds may return to previous nesting grounds to find their habitat unavailable.

Next: Colorado Success Stories

(The information contained in this issue of Colorado's Wildlife Company was accurate at the time of original publication. Situations and circumstances described, staff positions, contact information, and dates of some events may have changed in the interim. Present knowledge and understanding of biological and behavioral facts and information may also be different than presented here.)



        Last Updated: 6/1/2007 3:27 PM